BMW M3 vs Mahindra Thar Roxx
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BMW M3 | Mahindra Thar Roxx | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 510 | 174 | +193.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 650 | 370 | +75.7% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 9.9 | 15.2 | -34.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (Global NCAP/BNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Diesel | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $108,324 | $26,988 | +301.4% |
- BMW M3 makes about 193% more power (510 vs 174 hp).
- Mahindra Thar Roxx is the more economical, at 15.2 km/L against 9.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and India); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: M3 or Thar Roxx?
BMW M3 advantages
- Engine power (+66%)
- Pulling torque (+43%)
Mahindra Thar Roxx advantages
- Fuel economy (+35%)
- Affordability (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BMW M3 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mahindra Thar Roxx if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the BMW M3 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Mahindra Thar Roxx delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
BMW M3 vs Mahindra Thar Roxx: which should you choose?
BMW M3 (2024 Competition xDrive) — petrol sedan with 510 hp and 650 Nm, rated at 9.9 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $108,324 in the Germany market.
Mahindra Thar Roxx (2024 AX7 L 4WD Diesel AT) — diesel suv with 174 hp and 370 Nm, rated at 15.2 km/L, 5-star Global NCAP/BNCAP safety; priced near $26,988 in the India market.
BMW M3 vs Mahindra Thar Roxx: BMW M3 is more powerful. BMW M3 makes about 193% more power (510 vs 174 hp). Mahindra Thar Roxx is the more economical, at 15.2 km/L against 9.9.
Performance
The BMW M3 is the more powerful, at 510 hp against 174 hp, with 650 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Mahindra Thar Roxx is more economical at 15.2 km/L against 9.9 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
BMW M3 is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Mahindra Thar Roxx 5 stars by Global NCAP/BNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mahindra Thar Roxx lists lower at about $26,988 (USD-converted from the India market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BMW M3 better than the Mahindra Thar Roxx?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. BMW M3 makes about 193% more power (510 vs 174 hp).
What is the main difference between the BMW M3 and the Mahindra Thar Roxx?
BMW M3 makes about 193% more power (510 vs 174 hp). Mahindra Thar Roxx is the more economical, at 15.2 km/L against 9.9.
Which is better value?
Mahindra Thar Roxx delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the BMW M3 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mahindra Thar Roxx if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.