BMW iX vs Lynk & Co 08 EM-P
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BMW iX | Lynk & Co 08 EM-P | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 523 | 381 | +37.3% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 765 | 615 | +24.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Plug-in Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | 3-DHT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $105,840 | $30,212 | +250.3% |
- BMW iX makes about 37% more power (523 vs 381 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: iX or 08 EM-P?
BMW iX advantages
- Engine power (+27%)
- Pulling torque (+20%)
Lynk & Co 08 EM-P advantages
- Affordability (+71%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BMW iX if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Lynk & Co 08 EM-P if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the BMW iX if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Lynk & Co 08 EM-P delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
BMW iX vs Lynk & Co 08 EM-P: which should you choose?
BMW iX (2022 xDrive50) — electric suv with 523 hp and 765 Nm, rated at 19.8 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $105,840 in the Germany market.
Lynk & Co 08 EM-P (2024 245km Halo Edition) — plug-in hybrid suv with 381 hp and 615 Nm, rated at 20.8 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $30,212 in the China market.
BMW iX vs Lynk & Co 08 EM-P: BMW iX is more powerful. BMW iX makes about 37% more power (523 vs 381 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The BMW iX is the more powerful, at 523 hp against 381 hp, with 765 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
BMW iX is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Lynk & Co 08 EM-P 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Lynk & Co 08 EM-P lists lower at about $30,212 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BMW iX better than the Lynk & Co 08 EM-P?
BMW iX takes the overall edge, though Lynk & Co 08 EM-P wins in specific areas worth weighing. BMW iX makes about 37% more power (523 vs 381 hp).
What is the main difference between the BMW iX and the Lynk & Co 08 EM-P?
BMW iX makes about 37% more power (523 vs 381 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Lynk & Co 08 EM-P delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the BMW iX if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Lynk & Co 08 EM-P if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.