BMW 330i xDrive vs Daihatsu Taft
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BMW 330i xDrive | Daihatsu Taft | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 255 | 52 | +390.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 400 | 60 | +566.7% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 11.9 | 20.5 | -42.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (NHTSA) | 4★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Shiftable Automatic | CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $47,500 | $10,560 | +349.8% |
- BMW 330i xDrive makes about 390% more power (255 vs 52 hp).
- Daihatsu Taft is the more economical, at 20.5 km/L against 11.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: 330i xDrive or Taft?
BMW 330i xDrive advantages
- Engine power (+80%)
- Pulling torque (+85%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Daihatsu Taft advantages
- Fuel economy (+42%)
- Affordability (+78%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BMW 330i xDrive if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Daihatsu Taft if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the BMW 330i xDrive if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
BMW 330i xDrive delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
BMW 330i xDrive vs Daihatsu Taft: which should you choose?
BMW 330i xDrive (2025 Base AWD) — petrol sedan with 255 hp and 400 Nm, rated at 11.9 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $47,500 in the US market.
Daihatsu Taft (2026 G Gas) — petrol kei suv with 52 hp and 60 Nm, rated at 20.5 km/L, 4-star JNCAP safety; priced near $10,560 in the Japan market.
BMW 330i xDrive vs Daihatsu Taft: BMW 330i xDrive is more powerful. BMW 330i xDrive makes about 390% more power (255 vs 52 hp). Daihatsu Taft is the more economical, at 20.5 km/L against 11.9.
Performance
The BMW 330i xDrive is the more powerful, at 255 hp against 52 hp, with 400 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Daihatsu Taft is more economical at 20.5 km/L against 11.9 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
BMW 330i xDrive is rated 5 stars by NHTSA and Daihatsu Taft 4 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Daihatsu Taft lists lower at about $10,560 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BMW 330i xDrive better than the Daihatsu Taft?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. BMW 330i xDrive makes about 390% more power (255 vs 52 hp).
What is the main difference between the BMW 330i xDrive and the Daihatsu Taft?
BMW 330i xDrive makes about 390% more power (255 vs 52 hp). Daihatsu Taft is the more economical, at 20.5 km/L against 11.9.
Which is better value?
BMW 330i xDrive delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the BMW 330i xDrive if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Daihatsu Taft if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.