Audi RS e-tron GT vs Volkswagen e-Up!
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi RS e-tron GT | Volkswagen e-Up! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 646 | 83 | +678.3% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 830 | 212 | +291.5% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 20.2 | 14.5 | +39.3% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 3★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $153,900 | $23,112 | +565.9% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 678% more power (646 vs 83 hp).
- Volkswagen e-Up! is the more efficient EV, using 14.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Verdict: RS e-tron GT or e-Up!?
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+87%)
- Pulling torque (+74%)
- Crash-test safety (+40%)
Volkswagen e-Up! advantages
- Energy efficiency (+28%)
- Affordability (+85%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Volkswagen e-Up! if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Audi RS e-tron GT delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Volkswagen e-Up!: which should you choose?
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Volkswagen e-Up! (2020 Pro) — electric hatchback with 83 hp and 212 Nm, rated at 14.5 kWh/100km, 3-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $23,112 in the Germany market.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Volkswagen e-Up!: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 678% more power (646 vs 83 hp). Volkswagen e-Up! is the more efficient EV, using 14.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 83 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Volkswagen e-Up! is the more efficient EV, drawing 14.5 kWh/100km against 20.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Audi RS e-tron GT is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Volkswagen e-Up! 3 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Volkswagen e-Up! lists lower at about $23,112 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi RS e-tron GT better than the Volkswagen e-Up!?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 678% more power (646 vs 83 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi RS e-tron GT and the Volkswagen e-Up!?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 678% more power (646 vs 83 hp). Volkswagen e-Up! is the more efficient EV, using 14.5 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Which is better value?
Audi RS e-tron GT delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Volkswagen e-Up! if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.