Audi RS e-tron GT vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi RS e-tron GT | Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 646 | 299 | +116.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 830 | 460 | +80.4% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 20.2 | 17.2 | +17.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $153,900 | $62,316 | +147.0% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 116% more power (646 vs 299 hp).
- Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV is the more efficient EV, using 17.2 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Verdict: RS e-tron GT or Enyaq Coupe iV?
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+54%)
- Pulling torque (+45%)
Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV advantages
- Energy efficiency (+15%)
- Affordability (+60%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV: which should you choose?
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV (2022 RS iV Coupe) — electric suv with 299 hp and 460 Nm, rated at 17.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $62,316 in the Germany market.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 116% more power (646 vs 299 hp). Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV is the more efficient EV, using 17.2 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 299 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV is the more efficient EV, drawing 17.2 kWh/100km against 20.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Audi RS e-tron GT is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV lists lower at about $62,316 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi RS e-tron GT better than the Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 116% more power (646 vs 299 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi RS e-tron GT and the Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 116% more power (646 vs 299 hp). Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV is the more efficient EV, using 17.2 kWh/100km against 20.2.
Which is better value?
Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.