Audi RS e-tron GT vs Ford F-150
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi RS e-tron GT | Ford F-150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 646 | 580 | +11.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 830 | 1,051 | -21.0% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 20.2 | 29.9 | -32.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (NHTSA) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | 1-Speed Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $153,900 | $67,900 | +126.7% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 11% more power (646 vs 580 hp).
- Audi RS e-tron GT is the more efficient EV, using 20.2 kWh/100km against 29.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and US); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: RS e-tron GT or F-150?
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+10%)
- Energy efficiency (+32%)
Ford F-150 advantages
- Pulling torque (+21%)
- Affordability (+56%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Ford F-150 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Value for money
Ford F-150 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Ford F-150: which should you choose?
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Ford F-150 (2026 Lightning Flash) — electric pickup with 580 hp and 1051 Nm, rated at 29.9 kWh/100km, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $67,900 in the US market.
Audi RS e-tron GT vs Ford F-150: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 11% more power (646 vs 580 hp). Audi RS e-tron GT is the more efficient EV, using 20.2 kWh/100km against 29.9.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 580 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more efficient EV, drawing 20.2 kWh/100km against 29.9 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Audi RS e-tron GT is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Ford F-150 5 stars by NHTSA. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Ford F-150 lists lower at about $67,900 (USD-converted from the US market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi RS e-tron GT better than the Ford F-150?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 11% more power (646 vs 580 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi RS e-tron GT and the Ford F-150?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 11% more power (646 vs 580 hp). Audi RS e-tron GT is the more efficient EV, using 20.2 kWh/100km against 29.9.
Which is better value?
Ford F-150 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Ford F-150 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.