Audi Q5 vs Mazda CX-60
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi Q5 | Mazda CX-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 268 | 327 | -18.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 400 | 500 | -20.0% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 10.2 | 14.6 | -30.1% |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Plug-in Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | 7-Speed Automated Manual | 8AT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $54,500 | $41,844 | +30.2% |
- Mazda CX-60 makes about 18% more power (327 vs 268 hp).
- Mazda CX-60 is the more economical, at 14.6 km/L against 10.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Q5 or CX-60?
Audi Q5 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Mazda CX-60 advantages
- Engine power (+18%)
- Pulling torque (+20%)
- Fuel economy (+30%)
- Affordability (+23%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Mazda CX-60 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Mazda CX-60 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi Q5 vs Mazda CX-60: which should you choose?
Audi Q5 (2026 Premium Plus 45 TFSI) — petrol suv with 268 hp and 400 Nm, rated at 10.2 km/L; priced near $54,500 in the US market.
Mazda CX-60 (2026 PHEV Premium Sports) — plug-in hybrid suv with 327 hp and 500 Nm, rated at 14.6 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $41,844 in the Japan market.
Audi Q5 vs Mazda CX-60: Mazda CX-60 is more powerful. Mazda CX-60 makes about 18% more power (327 vs 268 hp). Mazda CX-60 is the more economical, at 14.6 km/L against 10.2.
Performance
The Mazda CX-60 is the more powerful, at 327 hp against 268 hp, with 500 Nm of torque on tap. Its plug-in hybrid drivetrain pairs with a 8at transmission.
Running costs
The Mazda CX-60 is more economical at 14.6 km/L against 10.2 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Price and value
The Mazda CX-60 lists lower at about $41,844 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi Q5 better than the Mazda CX-60?
Mazda CX-60 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Mazda CX-60 makes about 18% more power (327 vs 268 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi Q5 and the Mazda CX-60?
Mazda CX-60 makes about 18% more power (327 vs 268 hp). Mazda CX-60 is the more economical, at 14.6 km/L against 10.2.
Which is better value?
Mazda CX-60 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Mazda CX-60 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.