Audi Q3 vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi Q3 | Audi RS e-tron GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 150 | 646 | -76.8% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 250 | 830 | -69.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $46,980 | $153,900 | -69.5% |
- Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 77% more power (646 vs 150 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (EU and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Q3 or RS e-tron GT?
Audi Q3 advantages
- Affordability (+69%)
Audi RS e-tron GT advantages
- Engine power (+77%)
- Pulling torque (+70%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi Q3 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Audi RS e-tron GT delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi Q3 vs Audi RS e-tron GT: which should you choose?
Audi Q3 (2024 35 TFSI S line) — petrol suv with 150 hp and 250 Nm, rated at 15.4 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $46,980 in the EU market.
Audi RS e-tron GT (2024 RS e-tron GT quattro) — electric sedan with 646 hp and 830 Nm, rated at 20.2 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $153,900 in the Germany market.
Audi Q3 vs Audi RS e-tron GT: Audi RS e-tron GT is more powerful. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 77% more power (646 vs 150 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Audi RS e-tron GT is the more powerful, at 646 hp against 150 hp, with 830 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Audi Q3 is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Audi RS e-tron GT 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Audi Q3 lists lower at about $46,980 (USD-converted from the EU market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi Q3 better than the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Audi RS e-tron GT takes the overall edge, though Audi Q3 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 77% more power (646 vs 150 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi Q3 and the Audi RS e-tron GT?
Audi RS e-tron GT makes about 77% more power (646 vs 150 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Audi RS e-tron GT delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi Q3 if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the Audi RS e-tron GT if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.