Car Comparison

Audi e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

Verdict
Audi e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV: Audi e-tron is more powerful

Head-to-head specifications

MetricAudi e-tronMitsubishi Outlander PHEVDifference
Max power (hp)408248+64.5%
Max torque (Nm)664450+47.6%
NCAP safety5★ (Euro NCAP)5★ (JNCAP)
Fuel typeElectricPlug-in Hybrid
TransmissionAutomaticSingle-Speed
Price (USD est.)$87,372$36,828+137.2%
  • Audi e-tron makes about 65% more power (408 vs 248 hp).
  • Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
  • Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.

Verdict: e-tron or Outlander PHEV?

Our recommendation
Audi e-tron takes the overall edge, though Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Audi e-tron advantages

  • Engine power (+39%)
  • Pulling torque (+32%)

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV advantages

  • Affordability (+58%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
  • Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if you want the lower upfront cost.
  • Choose the Audi e-tron if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.

Value for money

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Audi e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV: which should you choose?

Audi e-tron (2020 e-tron 55 quattro) — electric suv with 408 hp and 664 Nm, rated at 22.4 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $87,372 in the Germany market.

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (2026 P PHEV 4WD) — plug-in hybrid suv with 248 hp and 450 Nm, rated at 16.2 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $36,828 in the Japan market.

Audi e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV: Audi e-tron is more powerful. Audi e-tron makes about 65% more power (408 vs 248 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.

Performance

The Audi e-tron is the more powerful, at 408 hp against 248 hp, with 664 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.

Running costs

These cars use different energy types (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.

Safety

Audi e-tron is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV 5 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.

Price and value

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV lists lower at about $36,828 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Audi e-tron better than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV?

Audi e-tron takes the overall edge, though Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV wins in specific areas worth weighing. Audi e-tron makes about 65% more power (408 vs 248 hp).

What is the main difference between the Audi e-tron and the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV?

Audi e-tron makes about 65% more power (408 vs 248 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Plug-in Hybrid), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.

Which is better value?

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if you want the lower upfront cost.

Methodology

Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Audi e-tron profile → Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons