Audi e-tron vs FAW-Toyota bZ3C
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi e-tron | FAW-Toyota bZ3C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 408 | 272 | +50.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 664 | 360 | +84.4% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 22.4 | 12.5 | +79.2% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $87,372 | $26,572 | +228.8% |
- Audi e-tron makes about 50% more power (408 vs 272 hp).
- FAW-Toyota bZ3C is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 22.4.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: e-tron or bZ3C?
Audi e-tron advantages
- Engine power (+33%)
- Pulling torque (+46%)
FAW-Toyota bZ3C advantages
- Energy efficiency (+44%)
- Affordability (+70%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the FAW-Toyota bZ3C if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the Audi e-tron if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
FAW-Toyota bZ3C delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi e-tron vs FAW-Toyota bZ3C: which should you choose?
Audi e-tron (2020 e-tron 55 quattro) — electric suv with 408 hp and 664 Nm, rated at 22.4 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $87,372 in the Germany market.
FAW-Toyota bZ3C (2026 Pure Electric Sport SUV) — electric suv with 272 hp and 360 Nm, rated at 12.5 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $26,572 in the China market.
Audi e-tron vs FAW-Toyota bZ3C: Audi e-tron is more powerful. Audi e-tron makes about 50% more power (408 vs 272 hp). FAW-Toyota bZ3C is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 22.4.
Performance
The Audi e-tron is the more powerful, at 408 hp against 272 hp, with 664 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a automatic transmission.
Running costs
The FAW-Toyota bZ3C is the more efficient EV, drawing 12.5 kWh/100km against 22.4 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
Audi e-tron is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and FAW-Toyota bZ3C 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The FAW-Toyota bZ3C lists lower at about $26,572 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi e-tron better than the FAW-Toyota bZ3C?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Audi e-tron makes about 50% more power (408 vs 272 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi e-tron and the FAW-Toyota bZ3C?
Audi e-tron makes about 50% more power (408 vs 272 hp). FAW-Toyota bZ3C is the more efficient EV, using 12.5 kWh/100km against 22.4.
Which is better value?
FAW-Toyota bZ3C delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi e-tron if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the FAW-Toyota bZ3C if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.