Audi A6 Allroad vs Mazda Mazda 3
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi A6 Allroad | Mazda Mazda 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 367 | 162 | +126.5% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 500 | 213 | +134.7% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 37.0 | 15.9 | +132.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (ASEAN NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Plug-in Hybrid | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | DSG | 6AT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $83,376 | $35,490 | +134.9% |
- Audi A6 Allroad makes about 127% more power (367 vs 162 hp).
- Audi A6 Allroad is the more economical, at 37.0 km/L against 15.9.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and Malaysia); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: A6 Allroad or Mazda 3?
Audi A6 Allroad advantages
- Engine power (+56%)
- Pulling torque (+57%)
- Fuel economy (+57%)
Mazda Mazda 3 advantages
- Affordability (+57%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi A6 Allroad if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mazda Mazda 3 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Audi A6 Allroad if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Mazda Mazda 3 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi A6 Allroad vs Mazda Mazda 3: which should you choose?
Audi A6 Allroad (2026 55 TFSIe Allroad (C9)) — plug-in hybrid station wagon with 367 hp and 500 Nm, rated at 37 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $83,376 in the Germany market.
Mazda Mazda 3 (2026 2.0 High Plus Ignite) — petrol hatchback with 162 hp and 213 Nm, rated at 15.9 km/L, 5-star ASEAN NCAP safety; priced near $35,490 in the Malaysia market.
Audi A6 Allroad vs Mazda Mazda 3: Audi A6 Allroad is more powerful. Audi A6 Allroad makes about 127% more power (367 vs 162 hp). Audi A6 Allroad is the more economical, at 37.0 km/L against 15.9.
Performance
The Audi A6 Allroad is the more powerful, at 367 hp against 162 hp, with 500 Nm of torque on tap. Its plug-in hybrid drivetrain pairs with a dsg transmission.
Running costs
The Audi A6 Allroad is more economical at 37.0 km/L against 15.9 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Audi A6 Allroad is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Mazda Mazda 3 5 stars by ASEAN NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Mazda Mazda 3 lists lower at about $35,490 (USD-converted from the Malaysia market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi A6 Allroad better than the Mazda Mazda 3?
Audi A6 Allroad takes the overall edge, though Mazda Mazda 3 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Audi A6 Allroad makes about 127% more power (367 vs 162 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi A6 Allroad and the Mazda Mazda 3?
Audi A6 Allroad makes about 127% more power (367 vs 162 hp). Audi A6 Allroad is the more economical, at 37.0 km/L against 15.9.
Which is better value?
Mazda Mazda 3 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi A6 Allroad if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mazda Mazda 3 if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.