Oppo Find X2 Pro vs POCO F3
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Oppo Find X2 Pro | POCO F3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu v10 score | 592,540 | 820,233 | -27.8% |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 865 | Snapdragon 870 | — |
| Display | 6.7" 120 Hz | 6.7" 120 Hz | — |
| Battery (mAh) | 4,260 | 4,520 | -5.8% |
| Rear cameras | 48+13+48 MP | 48+8+5 MP | — |
| Front camera (MP) | 32 | 20 | — |
| RAM / storage (base) | 12 GB / 256 GB | 6 GB / 128 GB | — |
| Max configuration | 12 GB / 512 GB | 8 GB / 256 GB | — |
| Weight (g) | 217 | 196 | +10.7% |
| Connectivity / unlock | 5G · Under-display | 5G · Side-mounted | — |
| Launch price (USD) | $1,199–$1,299 | $349–$399 | +243.6% |
- POCO F3 leads on raw performance by about 28% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 870).
- POCO F3 is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Verdict: Find X2 Pro or POCO F3?
Oppo Find X2 Pro advantages
- Memory (+50%)
POCO F3 advantages
- Raw performance (+28%)
- Battery capacity (+6%)
- Lightness (+10%)
- Affordability (+71%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you multitask heavily or keep many apps alive.
- Choose the POCO F3 if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.
Value for money
POCO F3 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs POCO F3: which should you choose?
Oppo Find X2 Pro — Oppo Android 10 smartphone (2020) with a 6.7-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, Snapdragon 865, 4260 mAh battery and 48MP main camera, scoring about 592,540 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $1,199.
POCO F3 — POCO Android 11 smartphone (2021) with a 6.67-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, Snapdragon 870, 4520 mAh battery and 48MP main camera, scoring about 820,233 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $349.
Oppo Find X2 Pro vs POCO F3: POCO F3 is the faster phone. POCO F3 leads on raw performance by about 28% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 870). POCO F3 is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Performance and everyday use
The POCO F3 is the faster device on raw benchmarks (820,233 vs 592,540 on AnTuTu v10), running the Snapdragon 870 against the Snapdragon 865. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.
Display and battery
Oppo Find X2 Pro carries a 6.7-inch 120 Hz AMOLED against a 6.7-inch 120 Hz AMOLED on the POCO F3. Batteries are 4,260 and 4,520 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.
Cameras, storage and price
Rear arrays are 48+13+48 MP versus 48+8+5 MP, with 32 MP and 20 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 12 GB / 256 GB and 6 GB / 128 GB. The POCO F3 is the more affordable at about $349 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Oppo Find X2 Pro better than the POCO F3?
POCO F3 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. POCO F3 leads on raw performance by about 28% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 870).
What is the main difference between the Oppo Find X2 Pro and the POCO F3?
POCO F3 leads on raw performance by about 28% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 870). POCO F3 is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Which is better value?
POCO F3 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you multitask heavily or keep many apps alive. Choose the POCO F3 if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.
Methodology
Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.