Opel Mokka vs GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Opel Mokka | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 100 | 215 | -53.5% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 205 | 315 | -34.9% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 18.2 | 17.2 | +5.8% |
| NCAP safety | 4★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | Manual | E-CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $21,492 | $41,972 | -48.8% |
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 53% more power (215 vs 100 hp).
- Opel Mokka is the more economical, at 18.2 km/L against 17.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and China); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Mokka or Odyssey e:HEV?
Opel Mokka advantages
- Fuel economy (+5%)
- Affordability (+49%)
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Engine power (+53%)
- Pulling torque (+35%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Opel Mokka if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Opel Mokka if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Opel Mokka vs GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV: which should you choose?
Opel Mokka (2021 1.2 Turbo) — petrol suv with 100 hp and 205 Nm, rated at 18.2 km/L, 4-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $21,492 in the Germany market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Opel Mokka vs GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV: GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more powerful. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 53% more power (215 vs 100 hp). Opel Mokka is the more economical, at 18.2 km/L against 17.2.
Performance
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more powerful, at 215 hp against 100 hp, with 315 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a e-cvt transmission.
Running costs
The Opel Mokka is more economical at 18.2 km/L against 17.2 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
Opel Mokka is rated 4 stars by Euro NCAP and GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Opel Mokka lists lower at about $21,492 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Opel Mokka better than the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 53% more power (215 vs 100 hp).
What is the main difference between the Opel Mokka and the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 53% more power (215 vs 100 hp). Opel Mokka is the more economical, at 18.2 km/L against 17.2.
Which is better value?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Opel Mokka if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.