GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Suzuki Hustler
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Suzuki Hustler | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 64 | +235.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 98 | +221.4% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 22.6 | -23.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 4★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Hybrid | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $12,276 | +241.9% |
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp).
- Suzuki Hustler is the more economical, at 22.6 km/L against 17.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Hustler?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Engine power (+70%)
- Pulling torque (+69%)
- Crash-test safety (+20%)
Suzuki Hustler advantages
- Fuel economy (+24%)
- Affordability (+71%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Suzuki Hustler if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Suzuki Hustler delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Suzuki Hustler: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Suzuki Hustler (2026 Hybrid X Turbo) — hybrid kei suv with 64 hp and 98 Nm, rated at 22.6 km/L, 4-star JNCAP safety; priced near $12,276 in the Japan market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Suzuki Hustler: GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more powerful. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp). Suzuki Hustler is the more economical, at 22.6 km/L against 17.2.
Performance
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more powerful, at 215 hp against 64 hp, with 315 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a e-cvt transmission.
Running costs
The Suzuki Hustler is more economical at 22.6 km/L against 17.2 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Suzuki Hustler 4 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Suzuki Hustler lists lower at about $12,276 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Suzuki Hustler?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Suzuki Hustler?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp). Suzuki Hustler is the more economical, at 22.6 km/L against 17.2.
Which is better value?
Suzuki Hustler delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Suzuki Hustler if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.