GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Nissan Ariya
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Nissan Ariya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 218 | -1.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 300 | +5.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | Single-Speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $36,102 | +16.3% |
- Nissan Ariya makes about 1% more power (218 vs 215 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Ariya?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Pulling torque (+5%)
Nissan Ariya advantages
- Affordability (+14%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
- Choose the Nissan Ariya if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Nissan Ariya delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Nissan Ariya: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Nissan Ariya (2026 B6 FWD) — electric suv with 218 hp and 300 Nm, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $36,102 in the Japan market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Nissan Ariya: Nissan Ariya is more powerful. Nissan Ariya makes about 1% more power (218 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Nissan Ariya is the more powerful, at 218 hp against 215 hp, with 300 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Nissan Ariya 5 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Nissan Ariya lists lower at about $36,102 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Nissan Ariya?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Nissan Ariya makes about 1% more power (218 vs 215 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Nissan Ariya?
Nissan Ariya makes about 1% more power (218 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Nissan Ariya delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads. Choose the Nissan Ariya if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.