GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mercedes-Benz C300
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Mercedes-Benz C300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 255 | -15.7% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 400 | -21.3% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 11.5 | +49.6% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (NHTSA) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | 9-Speed Shiftable Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $52,800 | -20.5% |
- Mercedes-Benz C300 makes about 16% more power (255 vs 215 hp).
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 11.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and US); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or C300?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Fuel economy (+33%)
- Affordability (+21%)
Mercedes-Benz C300 advantages
- Engine power (+16%)
- Pulling torque (+21%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz C300 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mercedes-Benz C300: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Mercedes-Benz C300 (2026 Exclusive 4MATIC) — petrol sedan with 255 hp and 400 Nm, rated at 11.5 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $52,800 in the US market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Mercedes-Benz C300: Mercedes-Benz C300 is more powerful. Mercedes-Benz C300 makes about 16% more power (255 vs 215 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 11.5.
Performance
The Mercedes-Benz C300 is the more powerful, at 255 hp against 215 hp, with 400 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 9-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more economical at 17.2 km/L against 11.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Mercedes-Benz C300 5 stars by NHTSA. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV lists lower at about $41,972 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Mercedes-Benz C300?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Mercedes-Benz C300 makes about 16% more power (255 vs 215 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Mercedes-Benz C300?
Mercedes-Benz C300 makes about 16% more power (255 vs 215 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 11.5.
Which is better value?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the Mercedes-Benz C300 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.