GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Lynk & Co Z10
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Lynk & Co Z10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 422 | -49.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 440 | -28.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | Single-speed | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $30,212 | +38.9% |
- Lynk & Co Z10 makes about 49% more power (422 vs 215 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Z10?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Lynk & Co Z10 advantages
- Engine power (+49%)
- Pulling torque (+28%)
- Affordability (+28%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Lynk & Co Z10 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Lynk & Co Z10 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Lynk & Co Z10: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Lynk & Co Z10 (2025 Ultra Long Range RWD 800km) — electric sedan with 422 hp and 440 Nm, rated at 12.8 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $30,212 in the China market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Lynk & Co Z10: Lynk & Co Z10 is more powerful. Lynk & Co Z10 makes about 49% more power (422 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Lynk & Co Z10 is the more powerful, at 422 hp against 215 hp, with 440 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Petrol vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Lynk & Co Z10 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Lynk & Co Z10 lists lower at about $30,212 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Lynk & Co Z10?
Lynk & Co Z10 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Lynk & Co Z10 makes about 49% more power (422 vs 215 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Lynk & Co Z10?
Lynk & Co Z10 makes about 49% more power (422 vs 215 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Petrol vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Lynk & Co Z10 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Lynk & Co Z10 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.