GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Kia Telluride
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Kia Telluride | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 291 | -26.1% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 355 | -11.3% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 8.5 | +102.4% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (NHTSA) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | 8-Speed Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $54,200 | -22.6% |
- Kia Telluride makes about 26% more power (291 vs 215 hp).
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 8.5.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and US); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Telluride?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Fuel economy (+51%)
- Affordability (+23%)
Kia Telluride advantages
- Engine power (+26%)
- Pulling torque (+11%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the Kia Telluride if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want the lower upfront cost.
Value for money
Kia Telluride delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Kia Telluride: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Kia Telluride (2026 SX Prestige X-Pro) — petrol suv with 291 hp and 355 Nm, rated at 8.5 km/L, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $54,200 in the US market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Kia Telluride: Kia Telluride is more powerful. Kia Telluride makes about 26% more power (291 vs 215 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 8.5.
Performance
The Kia Telluride is the more powerful, at 291 hp against 215 hp, with 355 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a 8-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more economical at 17.2 km/L against 8.5 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Kia Telluride 5 stars by NHTSA. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV lists lower at about $41,972 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Kia Telluride?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Kia Telluride makes about 26% more power (291 vs 215 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Kia Telluride?
Kia Telluride makes about 26% more power (291 vs 215 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 8.5.
Which is better value?
Kia Telluride delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter. Choose the Kia Telluride if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.