GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Honda N-BOX
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Honda N-BOX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 64 | +235.9% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 104 | +202.9% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 20.3 | -15.3% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (JNCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $13,860 | +202.8% |
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp).
- Honda N-BOX is the more economical, at 20.3 km/L against 17.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Japan); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or N-BOX?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Engine power (+70%)
- Pulling torque (+67%)
Honda N-BOX advantages
- Fuel economy (+15%)
- Affordability (+67%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Honda N-BOX if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Honda N-BOX: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Honda N-BOX (2026 Custom L Turbo) — petrol kei tall wagon with 64 hp and 104 Nm, rated at 20.3 km/L, 5-star JNCAP safety; priced near $13,860 in the Japan market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Honda N-BOX: GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more powerful. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp). Honda N-BOX is the more economical, at 20.3 km/L against 17.2.
Performance
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more powerful, at 215 hp against 64 hp, with 315 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a e-cvt transmission.
Running costs
The Honda N-BOX is more economical at 20.3 km/L against 17.2 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Honda N-BOX 5 stars by JNCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Honda N-BOX lists lower at about $13,860 (USD-converted from the Japan market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Honda N-BOX?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Honda N-BOX?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 236% more power (215 vs 64 hp). Honda N-BOX is the more economical, at 20.3 km/L against 17.2.
Which is better value?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Honda N-BOX if you drive a lot and fuel costs matter.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.