GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Geely Emgrand
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV | Geely Emgrand | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 215 | 109 | +97.2% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 315 | 142 | +121.8% |
| Fuel economy (km/L) | 17.2 | 16.4 | +4.9% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (C-NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol | — |
| Transmission | E-CVT | CVT | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $41,972 | $11,872 | +253.5% |
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 97% more power (215 vs 109 hp).
- GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 16.4.
Verdict: Odyssey e:HEV or Emgrand?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV advantages
- Engine power (+49%)
- Pulling torque (+55%)
- Fuel economy (+5%)
Geely Emgrand advantages
- Affordability (+72%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Geely Emgrand if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Geely Emgrand delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Geely Emgrand: which should you choose?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV (2023 Rui Zhi Edition) — petrol mpv with 215 hp and 315 Nm, rated at 17.2 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $41,972 in the China market.
Geely Emgrand (2020 1.5L CVT Upward) — petrol sedan with 109 hp and 142 Nm, rated at 16.4 km/L, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $11,872 in the China market.
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV vs Geely Emgrand: GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more powerful. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 97% more power (215 vs 109 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 16.4.
Performance
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more powerful, at 215 hp against 109 hp, with 315 Nm of torque on tap. Its petrol drivetrain pairs with a e-cvt transmission.
Running costs
The GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is more economical at 17.2 km/L against 16.4 km/L on their certified cycles, which compounds meaningfully over years of ownership. Test cycles differ between markets, so treat cross-region figures as directional.
Safety
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Geely Emgrand 5 stars by C-NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Geely Emgrand lists lower at about $11,872 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV better than the Geely Emgrand?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV takes the overall edge, though Geely Emgrand wins in specific areas worth weighing. GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 97% more power (215 vs 109 hp).
What is the main difference between the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV and the Geely Emgrand?
GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV makes about 97% more power (215 vs 109 hp). GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV is the more economical, at 17.2 km/L against 16.4.
Which is better value?
Geely Emgrand delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GAC-Honda Odyssey e:HEV if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Geely Emgrand if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.