Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Kimi K2
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 25.0 | 24.0 | +4.2% |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 200K tokens | — |
| Blended price ($/1M tokens) | $0.13 | $0.51 | -74.5% |
| Output speed (tokens/s) | 54 | 35 | +54.3% |
| Access | Open weights | Open weights | — |
- Gemma 4 26B A4B leads overall capability (Intelligence Index 25.0 vs 24.0).
- Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper model to run at $0.13/1M blended tokens — about 3.9× cheaper.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B offers the larger context window (400K tokens), useful for long documents and codebases.
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Kimi K2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B advantages
- General intelligence (+4%)
- Context window (+50%)
- Affordability (+75%)
- Output speed (+35%)
Kimi K2 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Gemma 4 26B A4B if you need the strongest overall reasoning and accuracy.
- Choose the Gemma 4 26B A4B if you work with long documents or large codebases.
Value for money
Gemma 4 26B A4B offers more intelligence per dollar (4.1× the Intelligence-Index-per-cost of the alternative), making it the stronger value for high-volume use. It is also open-weight, so self-hosting can reduce costs further at scale.
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Kimi K2: which should you choose?
Gemma 4 26B A4B — Google text model with an Intelligence Index of 25, a 400K-token context window and a blended price of $0.13/1M tokens (open weights).
Kimi K2 — Moonshot AI text model with an Intelligence Index of 24, a 200K-token context window and a blended price of $0.51/1M tokens (open weights).
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Kimi K2: Gemma 4 26B A4B scores higher on the Intelligence Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B leads overall capability (Intelligence Index 25.0 vs 24.0). Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper model to run at $0.13/1M blended tokens — about 3.9× cheaper.
Capability: intelligence, coding and agentic work
On the composite Intelligence Index the Gemma 4 26B A4B scores 25.0 versus 24.0. Composite indices summarize many evaluations, but always test on your own workload before committing.
Context window and speed
The Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts up to 400K tokens per request, which sets how much documentation, transcript or code it can reason over at once. In measured throughput, Gemma 4 26B A4B generates faster (54 vs 35 tokens/s), which matters for interactive apps and high-volume pipelines.
Pricing and access
At blended per-token rates, Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper model to run ($0.13 vs $0.51 per 1M tokens). Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weights and Kimi K2 is open weights. Open-weight models can be self-hosted, trading per-call cost for infrastructure you manage; for production also weigh rate limits, throughput and data-residency requirements.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the ai model comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Gemma 4 26B A4B better than the Kimi K2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Gemma 4 26B A4B leads overall capability (Intelligence Index 25.0 vs 24.0).
What is the main difference between the Gemma 4 26B A4B and the Kimi K2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B leads overall capability (Intelligence Index 25.0 vs 24.0). Gemma 4 26B A4B is the cheaper model to run at $0.13/1M blended tokens — about 3.9× cheaper.
Which is better value?
Gemma 4 26B A4B offers more intelligence per dollar (4.1× the Intelligence-Index-per-cost of the alternative), making it the stronger value for high-volume use. It is also open-weight, so self-hosting can reduce costs further at scale.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Gemma 4 26B A4B if you need the strongest overall reasoning and accuracy. Choose the Gemma 4 26B A4B if you work with long documents or large codebases.
Methodology
Large language models are compared on independent leaderboard metrics: an Intelligence Index (a composite of reasoning and knowledge evaluations), Coding and Agentic indices where measured, community arena Elo, maximum context window, a blended API price per million tokens (weighted across cache-hit, input and output rates), and measured output speed in tokens per second. Where a model ships multiple reasoning-effort variants, we report its strongest variant. Benchmarks capture only part of real-world quality, which also depends on tool use, latency, safety and task fit — and this space moves quickly, so figures reflect the leaderboard snapshot on the page date.